"...the right thing at the right time."
Aan die hand van ‘n ooreenkoms wat ek bereik het met die gesamentlike regsverteenwoordiger van 5 van my gewese klante, het ek onderneem om die bekendmaking van my meer bekende gewese klante te staak.
Ek is via e-pos gekontak deur die regsverteenwoordiger wat 2 klante (reeds gelys) en 3 klante (ongelys) verteenwoordiger. Ek het onderneem om alle inligting wat reeds verskyn het te verwyder, enige verdere inligting terug te hou en te vervang met hierdie kennisgewing, waarvan die bewoording in orde gevind is.
In ruil vir die nie-bekendmaking van my identiteit deur die betrokke regsverteenwoordiger, onttrek ek alle inligting privaat en in die publiek, weerhou ek my om met alle vorme van die media in verbinding te tree, weerhou ek my van deelname aan enige internet debatte aangaande die onderwerp en onderneem ek om geen alternatiewe webtuistes en/of blogs te registreer/namens my te registreer.
Ek bied verskoning aan die gay gemeenskap in Suid Afrika, lede van die GLA, lede van Crime Expo SA.net asook die familie van klante wat reeds genoem was vir enige leed wat ek hul onwetend aangedoen het.
My intensies om my gewese klante te verewig op ‘n webblad was eerlik naamlik dat ek die selfsugtige behandeling deur bekendes jeens manlike en ander sekswerkers wou kelder. Ek het geen gelde of enige ander winste gemaak uit die bekendmaking van my gewese klante nie. Ek het onntrek aan die kontrak en verfilming van ‘n tv program aangesien die ooreenkoms met die betrokke regsverteenwoordiger my verdere deelname daaraan nie moontlik maak nie.
Ek is oortuig dat baie met tyd sal besef dat wat ek begin doen het die regte ding was op die regte tyd. Ek het geen wrok teen my gewese klante nie. Ek wou my gemoed verlos van die medewete dat bekendes ‘n dubbele lewe lei. Dat dit nie die mees etiese ding was om te doen nie is debateerbaar.
sa male prostitute
My Afrikaans is up to shit, but here goes:
"As a result of an agreement reached between the joint legal representative of five of my former clients, I've undertaken to desist from naming my more famous former clients. I was contacted by e-mail by the legal representative of two already listed and three unlisted clients. I undertook to destroy all information published to now, to hold back any further information, and to replace it with this notice, the wording of which was found to be in order.
"Contingent on the said legal representative maintaining my anonymity, I withdraw all public and private information, undertake not to contact any form of media, undertake not to participate in any 'internet' debate pertaining to the subject, and undertake not to register any Web sites and / or blogs in my or any other name.
"I apologise to the South African gay community, members of the GLA, members of Crime Expo SA.net and the families of clients already named for any pain I've unintentionally caused them. My intent in naming my former clients on a Web site was honourable in that I wished to put an end to the selfish behaviour meted out by celebrities to male and other sex workers. I made no money out of making known the names of my former clients. I have withdrawn from the filming of a TV programme because the agreement reached with the relevant legal representative makes my participation impossible.
"I'm convinced that, over time, many will realise that what I began was the right thing at the right time. I hold no grudges against my former clients. I merely wanted to speak out against the hypocrisy that governs the lives of well-known people. That it was perhaps not the best thing to do is debatable."
"I hold no grudges..."
Ja well no fine, as the old saying goes. I'm banking on it being a shrewd move by a cunning and conniving mind hell-bent on leaving the fray while he's still ahead or has to swap his newfound notoriety for a jail cell. Whichever way you look at it, either our well-connected gay blogger is dumb or his alleged former clients' lawyer has been snorting that shit far too long.
If sa male prostitute (who, in all likelihood, will one day be identified as Juan Uys) is acting on an e-mailed threat of legal action — perhaps sent out to several rent boys of ill-repute, he's tearing down his blog for fear of something other than the law. Besides, if contactable by e-mail, to believe his identity will remain a secret stretches naivety to new limits.
Moreover, most lawyers do not threaten high-profile gossips or libellers electronically. They flatten them with paperwork, ensure they remain exactly where they are, and set about making themselves a fortune convincing magistrates and judges their victims should not be exposed to natural light for years to come.
If Action Man is acting under threat of legal action, he has decided to flee the fray unscathed, unwilling to test his allegations in court or have five or six bullets pumped into him from an unmarked car at 02:00 while navigating some insalubrious neighbourhood. He'd rather go out as 'the guy who tried', the blogging gay activist who pushed free speech to the limits and was quashed by the system.
Most local Web heads and chat room trolls will probably take his 'Notice' as a tacit admission of guilt. By bowing to legal pressure, it could be said that he is admitting himself to be a fraud, a liar, a libeller and a criminal. He has therefore done nothing to upset 'the system'. He is the system and his is the way of the world. It always was and always will be.
"...I wanted to speak out."
Then again, if his allegations are true — I'm inclined to believe them — and he has been contacted by attorneys, he is far smarter than they or any of his alleged former clients. The above 'Notice' was allegedly agreed to. Superficially, it reads as an act of contrition. On second reading, it serves only our blogger's interests and purposes.
The 'Notice' refers to "my former clients" five or six times. If our happy hooker is telling the truth, he was contacted by a legal representative of five of them, two of whom have already been named. Their lawyer, in agreeing to the above wording, has admitted his clients' 'guilt' — and his clients could be any of those whose names are now forever engraved on the memory of the Web.
The lawyer, by representing the so-called interests of a further three unnamed gay whoremongers, has as much as admitted that more felt themselves threatened with exposure.
I'm willing to bet most South African media celebrities will now nervously claim to have not visited a lawyer at any time during May 2007. The so-called information cannot be retracted. It lives. And it will continue to do so. Such is the nature of the Web.
If sa male prostitute has been knocked off his blog by whoring high-lifers, they have resorted to silencing him — not by way of the courts — but through intimidation and threat. In short, they've compounded their crimes. If I were in their shoes, I'd probably do the same, but so much for freedom of speech.
It now carries a hefty price tag.
"...perhaps not the best thing to do."
Of course, most of these suppositions are generalisations. Each alleged former consumer of our high-flying rent boy’s services has probably reacted in his own way to the news of the week. A couple might have come to terms with the notion that it does not matter whether the allegations fit fact. Their lives, because they touched that of sa male prostitute and they made certain choices — be it in local politics, business, or anything else, have been irredeemably fucked up.
One or two might realise that having their lives trashed need not be an altogether bad thing. They might learn something from it. Most won't. A few might think they've nailed the bastard, a couple might still be out to get him, and most will probably carry on as before. And, no doubt, some of them — dripping sleaze and oozing an obsequious insincerity, will again slither into public focus at some time in the future.
And make a killing. sa male prostitute most certainly will. He's a survivor. Albeit as predictable as an addict.