Monday, June 30, 2003

Heart of Darkness or...

Racism for Dummies


Chinua Achebe Sells Himself Down the River

From 'The Island' by Athol Fugard
'Die Hodoshe Span'

Joe Duemer's teaching a freshman Humanities course on "the modern world". The booklist reads like a dream. Not having been subject to the teachings of professorial types, I wish I had a desk at Clarkson. Including Antigone, The Outsider, Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now, it represents large chunks of my life and, together, much of my worldview [I've not read Maus or The Last Summer of Reason].

In 1973, Brian Astbury and his wife, Yvonne Bryceland, who ran Cape Town's first 'theatre in the round', the Space, put on Athol Fugard's play, 'Die Hodoshe Span'. It translates loosely as The Work Team of the Carrion Fly. Watching Winston Ntshona and John Kani open South Africa to my 14-year eyes the play, better known as The Island [any reference to Robben Island would have had it banned], had a profound effect on me. Fugard's early plays and their performance remain strong influences.

Central to the play is a performance of Antigone by the two protagonists for fellow prisoners and their jackboot guards. For some reason yet to coalesce to thought, I can't think of a better script to tie Antigone to Heart of Darkness. It also somehow raises or addresses Joe's disagreement with Professor Chinua Achebe, who believes Joseph Conrad to have been racist.

Bump this selection up against Camus' The Outsider, and all hell could break loose. The bugger of it is that these works remain so close to my skin. Anybody who can deride Camus' work would not recognise beautiful writing were it rammed up their noses. Anybody not having seen the opportunity to better recognise the greatness of Mersault's story in everyday, common-or-garden situations, is lost.

In Fugard's play, the transcendent spirit evinced by Ntshona and Kani when, as a child, I watched the sweat and grind and ugliness of Robben Island defeated by a refusal to accept the unacceptable, could not have left me cold. That first performance spoilt the theatre for me. I've not seen another play like it.

Through Camus, I understand the world. Through Conrad, I expect it and, through Fugard, I experience it. I can't put it any better than that. Marry Mersault's 'benign indifference of the universe' to 'the horror' of Kurtz and Antigone's laws 'that come from God' and you have a blogger.

Government fighters drive through the Liberian city of Ganta, about 240km from the capital Monrovia, Monday, June 23, 2003. Ganta city is in ruins following claims by both sides of heavy fighting as clashes tore at a week-old truce in Liberia's escalating civil war. [Associated Press]
Who is this, Bubba? This is us.

"...Conrad pandered to a certain stereotype of African barbarity that, at the time, was accepted as the norm. Finally, we both agree that this stereotype is still with us today."

Guardian

Yeah, oh boy, Joseph Conrad the racist, I know him well. Joe [Duemer] points to a Guardian article, Out of Africa, wherein the interviewer, Caryl Phillips, finds common ground with Conrad deconstructionist and detractor, Chinua Achebe, one of Africa's greatest writers. Achebe argues convincingly for Conrad's indictment as an out-and-out racist. I think he's suffering Pauling's Disease.

Apparently, as he got older, Linus Pauling [he of quantum complementarity and a couple of deserved Nobel Prizes], took to eating vast quantities of Vitamin C. Devoting books to the subject, he punted it as a cure-all. I reckon he'd lapsed into early dementia. Take too much vitamin C and you end up pissing it against the wall. You ripping into the Vitamin C, Chinua?

Perhaps Joseph Conrad, in some weird way, validates some inadequacy felt by fellow author Chinua Achebe. The Guardian article is well but duplicitously argued, but I reckon Achebe should be more upset by its title, Out of Africa, than by any long-dead white male. It would be interesting to hear his opinion of Isak Dinesen [Karen Blixen] and 'her Africans'.

Heh... I wonder at the mind of the sub-editor who headlined the article. He or she is either dumb, artful or disagrees emphatically with Achebe. It's rather like calling the "father of modern African literature" the Lion King. So why does Achebe see Conrad as "a thoroughgoing racist"? Bugger you, I'm not going to synthesise it here. Go read his paper, An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness.

Achebe is as disingenuous as he accuses Conrad of being. Ultimately, though, he is dead wrong and somewhat pathetic as he resorts to defending the indefensible, a silly paper he wrote a while back.

I have no doubt Achebe would heap scorn on anybody purporting to relate to his post-colonial African identity and feelings of personal injury when confronted by the colonial-era writing of a dead European author. To pretend to do so would be like a male cop telling a female rape victim [sorry, 'survivor'] he knows just how she feels.

Nobody but someone who has walked a mile in Achebe's shoes can tell where he's coming from. He is, however, taking undue advantage of a privileged position and anybody can call him on that. The paper and the article are so littered with gaping illogicalities, specious statements and generalisations, I'd be happy to argue my allegations any time.

Achebe's accusation is illogical, flies in the face of Conrad's body of work, diminishes its contribution to an awareness of colonialism's dark side, and wallows cumbersomely in "...a bombardment of emotive words and other forms of trickery". He ascribes judgement where there is none, deflects attention from the origins today's post-modern global slavery, and ignores Conrad's sense of the absurd and European mockery of self. He purposefully ascribes malicious intent where there is none, and offers evidence of a thin skin and serious personal insecurities.

Fuck it, he reminds me of my president, Thabo Mbeki, a bright man who needs to get a grip on himself.

Chinua Achebe has his row to hoe. Joseph Conrad had his, a century ago. I put it that Conrad had it a damned side tougher making it as an artist in 1901 than the revered father of African literature has in skewering him a century later. Conrad's problem was essentially European. What is Achebe's?

"And where is the proof that he is on my side? A few statements about it not being a very nice thing to exploit people who have flat noses? This is his defence against imperial control? If so it is not enough. It is simply not enough. If you are going to be on my side what is required is a better argument."

Chinua Achebe

Never Mind the Weather


This year, Cape Town's weather has been weird. It's mid-winter and the cold freezes the bones to the marrow. If one stays indoors, that is.

Outside, the mercury's been hitting 22-27 degrees Celsius on a regular basis. But we've had no rain. For a winter-rainfall region, it's not good news and the farmers are making the most of the space given them to bleat about 'the drought'.

We have a drought due in the next year or two but, if I know Cape Town, we'll probably see a surfeit of miserable weather come storm month, August. The dams will fill to about two-thirds of their capacity and those in charge of water management will continue to do bugger all to plan for our fifteen-year weather cycle.

In the early 70s and mid-to-late 80s, our winters were extraordinarily mild affairs and no rain fell. Drought is inevitable. To pretend surprise when it arrives along is a sure sign of negligence.

Mind you, without rain, it's bloody cold. Our average low has been running between 8 and 13 degrees which, in houses and offices without central heating, is bloody awful. Try explaining that to a foreigner, though. I see them wandering through the city in T-shirts and shorts. Bloody animals.

A north is blowing promises of rain...

Just Do It


As you're aware, I'm moving blog. It's a bugger. Frank doesn't think so and Joe turns it into a mystical experience. Si Adam just does it. I hadn't read SiBlog before coming on it at Wayward Webloggers and was thrown by its spring-water freshness. Without lapsing into condescension and as a parent, Si, I guess reaction to your blog might enable you to see why your folks are so damned proud of you.

Sunday, June 29, 2003

Destiny Tracks Anger...

...to History's Slow Tide


Walls of water do not the best neighbours make

Stripping the mask...
Stripping the mask...

Meditation on a Lake View, Douglas Ord's latest three-part essay now at Lear's Shadow, begins with about as much excitement as the graphic illustrating it, a view of Lake Ontario's flat, featureless expanse from Sunnyside Beach, west of Toronto.

Ord's photographed lake sustains no mythology. It is a still, dull stretch of water which, depending on your point of view and knowledge of history, separates two people from or pits them against each other. It seems no Excalibur will rise from the depths of Lake Ontario and no Arthur will claim his sword.

It is as Ord portrays it; flat, calm, dead.

Yet, as the lake's placid waters, constricted by two breakwaters, rise to meet a sky as blue as itself, in the narrow line bisecting Heaven and the great body of water we find the author's vision of a near-visible Hell, the United States of America.

Writing with his trademark dispassionate style, Ord's measured prose first dissects a Time magazine [Canadian edition] cover story highlighting his country's declining fortunes, Would Anyone Notice if Canada Disappeared?

The accompanying cover and inside front-cover graphics show, on the one hand, only ocean where once the great northern landmass stood and, on the other, a shrunken Canada subject to the unblinking scrutiny of a United States personified to godly proportions.

Ord's gripe is that Time, its publishers, its content and its intent are about as Canadian as duck-billed platypuses. He argues that the article's U.S.-grounded, baseless view [permeating its editorial policy] stems from a mindset equating government to godhead and purposefully sets out to skew perceptions.

His reasoned wrath and compelling words boil beneath tightly-reined words while, beneath the skin of its water, Lake Ontario seethes with a potentially devastating anger.

Doug Ord sees much in little, but he eschews conjecture for its own sake. In the first of three pieces, his scathing words flense fat from the bones of deceit. Pink with a barely-suppressed post-colonial rage, he dissects the motives of those arguing Canada's demise as a force to be reckoned with.

He then flays them with turkeys. I kid you not. The map ain't yellow; it's chicken.

Part 2 objectifies his frustration, juxtaposing two contradictory graphics, highlighting fractured U.S. and Canadian perceptions, views and sentiments. It is here that he chooses his weapon and whips the waters of a lake that is at once a gateway and an insurmountable obstacle to white-capped fury.

He opts for the tried and tested, i.e. a play-off of perceptions. Where the magazine protagonists eliminate each other with water, Ord uses his photograph of the lake to sink Time's unctuous projection of the U.S.' as the self-ordained global guardian of all that is good and just.

...from Liberty's beautiful face
...from Liberty's beautiful face

In Part 3, the lake yields not Excalibur and the possibility of redemption but the wrath of Apocalypse. Free of their underwater chains, the stories of myth, history, civilisation, culture, war, conquest, disease and genocide rise to speak for themselves from an American sky.

They do so unerringly and unnervingly. They speak with a voice embracing international, national, local and personal tragedy. Reading this climactic, telling section, the breakwaters impinging on Ord's graphic reminded me of Mulberries...

...artificial harbours designed and constructed by the British in World War II to facilitate the unloading of supply ships off the coast of Normandy, France, immediately following the invasion of Europe on June 6, 1944. One harbour, known as Mulberry "A," was constructed off Saint-Laurent at Omaha Beach in the American sector, and the other, Mulberry "B," was built off Arromanches at Gold Beach in the British sector.

The connection made and the former adversaries identified, Ord reins in and focuses global anxiety, distilling it to a recollection of the brutal attack on Toronto by American forces under General Dearborn 190 years ago, not far from where the lake, now silent and unspeaking, laps a brooding, blood-soaked shore.

With a final, deft shift, the waters become the eternal guardian of a young and broken life and the air above becomes poisoned forever.

Articulating how those living 'across the water' see the United States of America today, Meditation on a Lake View should shock many to their senses. Whether it will, remains to be seen.

Note In outlining the content of Ord's graphic essay, I have sought to conceal rather than reveal. Meditation on a Lake View is nerve-wracking stuff, linking the seemingly innocuous and somewhat foolish to the blatantly threatening and devastatingly lethal without skipping a beat.

Rewriting History?

Only the Paranoid Leader...


...can Truly Understand the Evil Emperor

'...revisionist historians is what I like to call them.'
'...the paranoid is a militant leader'

"This nation acted to a threat from the dictator of Iraq. Now there are some who would like to rewrite history---revisionist historians is what I like to call them. Saddam Hussein was a threat to America and the free world in '91, in '98, in 2003."

George W. Bush

As a member of the avant-garde who is capable of perceiving the conspiracy before it is fully obvious to an as yet unaroused public, the paranoid is a militant leader. He does not see social conflict as something to be mediated and compromised, in the manner of the working politician. Since what is at stake is always a conflict between absolute good and absolute evil, what is necessary is not compromise but the will to fight things out to a finish. Since the enemy is thought of as being totally evil and totally unappeasable, he must be totally eliminated—if not from the world, at least from the theatre of operations to which the paranoid directs his attention. This demand for total triumph leads to the formulation of hopelessly unrealistic goals, and since these goals are not even remotely attainable, failure constantly heightens the paranoid’s sense of frustration. Even partial success leaves him with the same feeling of powerlessness with which he began, and this in turn only strengthens his awareness of the vast and terrifying quality of the enemy he opposes.

The enemy is clearly delineated: he is a perfect model of malice, a kind of amoral superman—sinister, ubiquitous, powerful, cruel, sensual, luxury-loving. Unlike the rest of us, the enemy is not caught in the toils of the vast mechanism of history, himself a victim of his past, his desires, his limitations. He wills, indeed he manufactures, the mechanism of history, or tries to deflect the normal course of history in an evil way. He makes crises, starts runs on banks, causes depressions, manufactures disasters, and then enjoys and profits from the misery he has produced. The paranoid’s interpretation of history is distinctly personal: decisive events are not taken as part of the stream of history, but as the consequences of someone’s will. Very often the enemy is held to possess some especially effective source of power: he controls the press; he has unlimited funds; he has a new secret for influencing the mind [brainwashing]; he has a special technique for seduction [the Catholic confessional].

It is hard to resist the conclusion that this enemy is on many counts the projection of the self; both the ideal and the unacceptable aspects of the self are attributed to him. The enemy may be the cosmopolitan intellectual, but the paranoid will outdo him in the apparatus of scholarship, even of pedantry. Secret organizations set up to combat secret organizations give the same flattery. The Ku Klux Klan imitated Catholicism to the point of donning priestly vestments, developing an elaborate ritual and an equally elaborate hierarchy. The John Birch Society emulates Communist cells and quasi-secret operation through “front” groups, and preaches a ruthless prosecution of the ideological war along lines very similar to those it finds in the Communist enemy. Spokesmen of the various fundamentalist anti-Communist “crusades” openly express their admiration for the dedication and discipline the Communist cause calls forth.
more...

[Richard Hofstadter The Paranoid Style in American Politics November, 1964]

I have it in me so much nearer home | To scare myself with my own desert places.

Robert Frost

Coming Soon 'The End of the World - The Upside of the Neocon Coup' [I kid you not]

Saturday, June 28, 2003

United States Slips into Coma


World Turns a Blind Eye


"It was cocaine of the soul," snorts prominent blogger

"It really looks like a situation where they make the rules up as they go along."

Elisa Massimino Lawyers Committee for Human Rights

'I went down where the vultures feed | I would've got deeper, but there wasn't any need...'

The rain falls down on last year's man, that's a Jew's harp on the table, that's a crayon in his hand. And the corners of the blueprint are ruined since they rolled far past the stems of thumbtacks that still throw shadows on the wood. And the skylight is like skin for a drum I'll never mend and all the rain falls down amen on the works of last year's man.

To some degree, we all view the world, an extension of ourselves, as a living, breathing entity made in our image. Conversely, just as we project parts of our psyche onto the world, we feel it shaping our dreams and aspirations.

We enjoy a closer relationship with our world than we generally choose to accept. We project ourselves onto it and see ourselves in it. Countries, cultures and histories are integral parts of our greater, communal self and intellectual, physical, emotional, and spiritual being. I might view the tattered remnants of 'old' Europe as the seat of my culture in much the same way an American might view Africa, an integral part of our breathing planet, as the dark and atavistic side of our universal soul.

Over the past two years, the U.S. president and his fellow Americans have done much to disillusion me. Recently, I have felt betrayed, resentful, and somewhat lost. Mentally and emotionally, I felt your America was possibly no longer mine. I was losing sight of the America of which Tom Shugart, Frank Paynter, and AKMA write, the America in which it is possible to clearly discern values in action.

These guys don't bluff themselves. They're keeping more than a dream alive. They're safeguarding the myth of our salvation, the most important story we have with which to realise ourselves and those we hope to shelter from harm. Others are kidding themselves. Theirs is a dark and fearful America, a mental fortress I refuse to enter, a spiritual prison devoid of love, hope, and faith.

Our view of the world changes dramatically when we lose touch with that part of our psyche seeing the greater whole. We express ourselves accordingly. As people contributing to a community of writers, we share our thoughts in words. Watching my growing alienation from my idea of the U.S., I saw my flow of blog entries slow and virtually dry up, a statement in itself.

Yep, I was hanging in here by a thread, not knowing or admitting the cause of my frustration and disillusionment. But U.S. bloggers, people who live in that great space, be it Canada or the United States, helped keep alive that part of my psyche taken up by my imagined America.

My recent blog entry on deciding to leave a company I once belonged to had little to do with my experience in 1995 and everything to do with a powerful desire to walk away from blogging, a need to cut myself off. My blogging of Stanton's words had less to do with contemplation than that which I was contemplating, the process in which I was taking part.

I have a vision of the land in which most of my blog friends live, North America and, more particularly, the United States. Yes, that is all your country is to me, a vivid dream of a felt memory and a sense of the good things the future might have brought to all of us through its existence. It is a myth born of literature, poetry, cheap novels, Hollywood, song, and narrative. It is a myth echoed by writers, thinkers and artists, the usual suspects.

To now, and having touched land there only briefly more than twenty years ago, my dream of what it might mean to me has remained unsullied. I have tried to write it, but have come up short and wanting. The myth of the United States is a part of who I am. But I was confused and wanted to sever myself from it. All I knew was that the U.S. I had known was yesterday's man.

The United States cut itself off, validating the views of those who saw isolation in the Bush doctrine and setting itself beyond all that which is acceptable to our myth of a greater whole.

I met a lady, she was playing with her soldiers in the dark. Oh one by one she had to tell them that her name was Joan of Arc. I was in that army, yes I stayed a little while; I want to thank you, Joan of Arc, for treating me so well. And though I wear a uniform I was not born to fight; all these wounded boys you lie beside, goodnight, my friends, goodnight.

"...do what truth obliges you to do. Not in the name of 'rights,' those malleable implements of political convenience and inconvenience, but in the name of life."

Somebody for whom I have the utmost respect and affection said the above.

Over the past few days, realising I was thinking of closing this blog without regret or second thought, I continued watching the river. I wanted to find the underlying cause of my dissatisfaction with things American and my recent belligerence towards perceived intolerance or indifference to the United States' role in moderating global interaction. So I read the blogs. My blogs; those I link to and some to which I don't for reasons that have more to do with time than anything else.

In a sense, I've been re-learning simple truths. I've been to all the same old places. Funny thing about the same old places. While they live in us, we put life on temporary hold as we revisit them. But they're there to 'remind us', but not to be lived in. We generally forget the good things we leave behind there, in those old places. I do, anyway. Now I'm back; older, uglier, and not much wiser. Life goes on. I accept these things. I am, after all, a blogger and a professional. I take these things in my stride.

When I write naturally, I write personal shit. This inevitably involves other people. I do not like to hurt other people because I do not like to be hurt myself. Since September last year, after I pulled the plug on 'personal' blogging, George W. Bush has allowed me to focus on matters that affect all of us.

Yet, I knew that I'd eventually have to weigh the sometimes selfish sensitivities of others against my own. If I do not write of that which affects me, I go stark raving mad. Call it selfishness, call it what you like. I call it 'Keeping no secrets from myself.'

In my growing antipathy to all things American, I sensed an underlying dishonesty. It nagged at me. Getting to the bottom of this uncomfortable animosity has been a priority. I discovered, while trawling through others' blogs and my old posts, that I've published most of my personal 'secrets' and have little to hide but that which others would have me keep confidential.

Since starting blogging, I've been frank about that which I see George W. Bush and his thugs visiting on the world. I believed that if the United States invaded Iraq, it would spark a global war it can only lose. Ultimately, as individuals we all witness the end of the world. We idle to our personal apocalypses and time sweeps us away. In the myriad spaces dedicated to George W. Bush's determination to secure his Pax Americana, I see the American Apocalypse. Despite that which good people are doing, it is still very much on the cards.

In my blog entries, I kept harping on certain subjects, such as Joe Conrad's Heart of Darkness and the blunt papers of the U.S.' military planners, people who see perpetual war as the 'export of stability'. These books and papers to which I refer, are seductive. Much like the communications tools we use, they are physical and mental constructs. There is far more to us and the world in which we live. I think we all occasionally lose sight of this.

In March, the country a ravaged waste, the United States invaded Iraq. As American soldiers watched the libraries and museums of antiquity burn and encouraged looting, the world changed. Why? Because America changed itself in the mind of the world through its actions. It drew into itself, shut off all access to the infinite possibilities it represents in the minds of billions, and closed the gate.

I did not sever ties with the U.S. of my psyche. The United States severed its ties to me, validating the views of those who see only isolation in the Bush doctrine. More, by its illegal and cynical action, it set itself beyond international law and anything acceptable to our myth of a greater whole.

History has a habit of repeating itself. Those who want to buck that trend are on to a hiding to nothing. We as people or I, as a blogger, cannot change the world or the inevitable. What we can do, through action, is influence the outcome. Surprisingly, however, although the future had been so clearly mapped and spelt out, the United States' retreat into itself shocked me. I had to come to terms with a new world, a world devoid, for now, of my mental myth. I fell silent.

Luckily, through the Internet and other peoples' blogs, I was able to see the same bewilderment at work in those I call my American friends, the people with whom I blog and to whom I am, in a real sense, bound.

I was intensely angry with the United States, its government and, by extension, its people. My antipathy arose out of a loathing of intellectual dishonesty and proclaimed ignorance. While I've done my fair share of berating the right, the politicians and effete intellectual leaders of the left have done more to shut down the United States than any other group.

Their equivocation or silence has lent respectability to George W. Bush and his neo-conservative handlers. Worse, they have given him carte blanche to foist his philosophy of Perpetual War on the world. With few exceptions, those leading the American left [its politicians, intellectuals and philosophers] are running scared. They are in denial and are paralysed. They are in hiding and do not know what to do.

Thirty years ago, the same people had no doubts. Today, those who regale us with the noble action of their youth appear stuck or glued to the spot.

What is the result of their inaction? People continue to suffer and die.

On the blogs, The Great Post-Modern Debate has been a revelation for me. Not being an intellectual or an academic, I am unable to converse with those speaking a language I do not know and have therefore been a bystander. I readily admit I cannot tell a postmodern from a postman. The postman, however, always rings twice. I believe the postmodern to be just as persistent. My inability to speak in tongues does not preclude me hearing what is said.

Most of that which is balanced by thoughtful reason and a just, feeling morality boils down to hogwash. When intellectual debate becomes polarised, the scholars stand out from pseuds lost in endless reruns of a bad Walt Disney movie. You want post-modernism. Listen to Dylan and shift shape in every line.

There is no need for our intellectual and academic leaders to dissect or find new approaches to the Bush administration's war on the world. Any such 'need' is little more than a political ploy. It has the warmongers and gunrunners in stitches and leaves them free to do as they please. In addition, it leaves our intellectual leaders free to enjoy their paralysis in the comfort of tenures served in ivory towers or the air-condtioned hotel rooms marking speaking trails undertaken between books.

With the avarice of starving pigs, those supporting Bush have acted. They have descended on the ancient world and torn up our history and the lives of millions. They are [with the help of media pinch-hitters like Thomas Friedman] quite prepared to march into the Holy Land, annexing our past, present and future.

As the mind of the leaderless left wallows in self-pity and denial, and draws out circles of confabulation into supposedly meaningful discourse [trying to make a silk purse of a sow's ear], those being attacked and those taking advantage of such attacks step up their reasonable resistance. More die.

As the educated elite whiles away the lives of thousands in cloistered talk shows broadcast for online voyeurs, it loses shape, form and substance. It is left to merchants of death and those who've lost hope to do the American left's work for it. Sooner, rather than later, the drip-drip of body bags returning from the East will become a flow and, perhaps in five or ten years' time, a once familiar flood.

It will then be left to those who weigh up the cost of gas against that of dead 'rag heads', blacks and 'Chinks' to call a halt to escalating costs. These people adopt the warlord's latest line with unthinking indifference, moving easily from lie to unconscionable lie, caring not a damn when 'found out'.

When the unthinking masses decide enough is enough, the politically correct intellectuals of the left, having cut themselves off from the discourse of chaos, their sense of intellectual opportunism intact, will surface once more to ride an unruly wave of dissatisfaction to office and a fundamentally immoral and crudely labeled 'justice', from which it will reap pecuniary reward.

Those prepared to ride such a wave are no better than those they proclaim to declaim.

Inaction leads to a sham and a shameful lie. While there is a need for discourse, action in the face of injustice beats talk to a solution every time. Leaderless, the more-than-capable mind of the left is paralysed.

So far as we are human, what we do must be either evil or good: so far as we do evil or good, we are human: and it is better, in a paradoxical way, to do evil than to do nothing: at least we exist.

T.S. Eliot

As a counter to the trailertrash mentality of the unfeeling, the silent tide of a decent person's morality is as effective as sand against stone. It erodes, eventually reducing rock to sand.

I came upon a wedding that old families had contrived; Bethlehem the bridegroom, Babylon the bride. Great Babylon was naked, oh she stood there trembling for me, and Bethlehem inflamed us both like the shy one at some orgy. And when we fell together all our flesh was like a veil that I had to draw aside to see the serpent eat its tail.

Another person I respect calls bloggers 'self-involved.' It wasn't intended as a compliment and brought me up short. Perhaps blogging is a First World wank. But, fuck it, no. I like being self-involved. I like self-involved people. I particularly like writers and bloggers who are self-involved. It generally denotes a degree of self-admitted 'fucked-upness' and a desire to see things in a different light or, at least, more clearly.

To me, self-involvement signals a willingness to take what's there and realise or change it. Blogging is about being self-involved so that I may better appreciate the world and those about me. That's why I still love the 'personal' bloggers, the war bloggers, the academics, and the techies. Like me, they're irredeemable recidivists, wild animals, hopeless cases, fools. They're covering the same old ground, trying to find another way or accept the one they've chosen. And they're willing to share the ride.

I believe most who write, in some way, realise that we're alone in this thing called life and our one hope, as people, is to share what we have. It's how we become who we are. It's a case of "We're in this together, Bubba, come hell or High Water." Eh... High Water's no longer here. Ah well, being a good Catholic boy, I've grown accustomed to the idea of hell. Bring on the brimstone.

I doubt Tish would beat me about the head were I to label her the antithesis of the American intellectual leftist. I reckon she'd take it for the compliment it is. She keeps an intensely personal, always sensitive and often passionate blog in which she writes of everyday life. I've come to know Tish over the past eighteen months through her words. Although she slings insults at the gun ghouls whenever given cause or opportunity, she does not go out of her way to pick fights with the political evils of our time.

Yet, with the few honest intellectual leftists I have listed on my blogroll, she and other personal bloggers [also listed on my blogroll] are leading whatever counter there is to the madness that has turned America into an international scourge and pariah. With Tish, it's hard to miss. Any doubts as to her feelings about being 'closed down' by moral mercenaries must be self-induced. She wears her blog heart on her sleeve in the form of countless graphic links to small groups fighting for justice wherever it has gone AWOL.

In the clarity of her beliefs and the honesty of her writing, argument is shown up for a fearful waste of good blogging time.

What binds Tish to honest scholars and street fighters? Much as those wedded to unthinking indifference will map the future with body parts, introspective writers, artists, philosophers, academics and others are moved almost intuitively to express revulsion at the warmonger's way. With Tish and many others, instead of letters to the editor or papers, it's a flood of colour and strongly felt words expressed in logos.

Looking at the labels adorning so many sites, I sometimes wonder whether outrage has become packaged, labeled and commoditized, or whether we who cut ourselves off from the subject of our anger have not become cut off from the causes motivating our use of these small marks of passion.

Whatever our reason or manner of expression, decent, thinking people worldwide are expressing their dissent in small but meaningful ways. Whether, like Elaine, we rage against the machine or, like son b!X, get involved with our local communities, people are saying "No."

Nowhere is this more evident than on the Web. As a counter to the trailer-trash mentality of the unfeeling right, the silent tide of a decent person's morality is as effective as sand against stone. It erodes, eventually reducing rock to sand.

Where are our left-wing sophists? They're still searching for leadership and struggling to catch up with ordinary people.

For the most part, events have overtaken any reasonable response. The mainstream media constitute theme parks for the mind or serve as cocaine for the soul.

Some women wait for Jesus, and some women wait for Cain so I hang upon my altar and I hoist my axe again. And I take the one who finds me back to where it all began when Jesus was the honeymoon and Cain was just the man. And we read from pleasant Bibles that are bound in blood and skin that the wilderness is gathering all its children back again.

I've been reading the Happy Tutor over the past few days. Having come to it late and sideways [how else does one do it when one enjoys the company of Paynter?], I tracked the start of The Great Post-Modern Debate to his bordello through comments made by Stanton and ray.

As Tish serves as a model of the personal blogger, the Tutor exemplifies the intellectuals I enjoy reading. You will find Matrullo popping in to correct him when he errs. Salo is ever ready to put him straight. Salo and Matrullo. Perhaps that should be S&M, given the context.

Never mind. Others dive in and argue, but few disagree. The Tutor is a hands-on kinda guy. He, together with those I know who pop into his place, has been propping me up. He writes beautifully, linking to many blogs and people who write with similar skill. Were that more of us had such insight and knowledge of who we are. As my friend Dimitri said in an e-mail a couple of weeks ago, "...we have to own it all -- it is not them, it is us, that do these things."

How so? Do yourself a favour. Go over to WealthBondage and read the Tutor's posts from a week or so back. Perhaps more importantly, read the comments appended to the posts. Talk about Sex and the Pithy. Understanding and humour overcome fear. Fear is the scholar's greatest anaesthetic and the Tutor is conducting a hands-on workshop for the comfortably numb and those with some understanding of how best to regain one's feeling. Fear is being used to good effect by those in charge; by those who will be in charge for some time to come.

A couple of interesting counters to the Bush administration have been floated. One is a cop out.

Put a Democrat to the White House? Give me a break. As the Archbishop points out in the article below, all our politicians serve the same master. What is the new and unlikely messiah to do? Call the troops back home or lend the crime an air of respectability? Government knows that once you commit your country to a long-term campaign, civic and social structures are designed to ensure that it's seen through to its inevitable close.

Foreigners, like myself, who've seen the Democrats fall in line behind Bush, scoff at such attempts to 'rectify' the situation or bring about a political and market-related 'justice'. To us, the simple fact is that Bush has precipitated a conflict of a scale and magnitude not seen since Vietnam. It affects billions of people and will continue for years to come. For the most part, events have overtaken any reasonable response.

I live in a place and space very different to most on my blogroll. South Africa is a violent country. You are ten times more likely to be shot in South Africa than you are in the United States. Does that mean life comes to an end, that we live in fear or close ourselves off from those about us, be they our family, neighbours, friends, colleagues or the world? Nope. I believe it gives us a far greater appreciation of life and the choices we sometimes must make in order to keep living it and become ourselves.

Living with violence or the threat of violence can give people a greater appreciation and sound understanding of their politicians, business leaders, and sinners. We tend to call a spade a spade this side of the ocean. I might take a long time getting there but, in the end, I come to appreciate things for what they are. This appears not to be the case for most Americans. Like the intellectuals who fail to face up to the huge injustice being perpetrated in their name, they clothe themselves with ignorance and suffer others with scorn.

I see enormous anxiety crippling American intellectuals and their leaders. It's a good sign. Through the Tutor's and others' posts, I've come to realise that I am not cutting myself off from a part of myself, that part of my psyche made up by my friends, dreams, narratives and fictions I call the United States. They too experience this alienation. It is the government of The United States that has tried to sever its ties to the world.

It has attempted to set itself adrift on a sea of endless fear and it has not succeeded. Yet.

As a master of the carnal arts and a philanthropist to boot, the Tutor is not content to sit on his backside. Eager to thrash those of others, he is ruffling feathers, wandering into others' comfort zones, up-ending dearly held personal myths. I must say I've enjoyed myself tremendously over the past week. With AKMA, the Tutor has upped the ante considerably. In short, and to be vulgar beyond that which is acceptable in polite company, these two have posed a quiet question, "What would Jesus [substitute any applicable deity] do?"

For a layman, The Great Post-Modern Debate has a chicken-and-egg quality to it. That I feel the egg to be that eaten by the Curate is unimportant. The introduction of the spiritual into the wider debate is as much about chicken and eggs. If that part of me taken up by a myth called the United States manifests physically, mentally and emotionally, it does so spiritually as well.

Perhaps the nature of our medium and the ritual abuse of anything vaguely spiritual has made me avoid any mention of what is a fundamental part of our greater personal being. For sure, the 'spiritual' has little place in a world dominated by things. But is it the world that is dominated by materialism or only those who choose to see it that way? I think the latter.

The spiritual is communicated through our words and, on the Web, probably not through discussion of any interpretation of it. I am not speaking of religion or evangelism. We speak of 'voice'. I no longer glance at Google News or Yahoo! News to keep up to date with current events. These aggregators have no 'voice'. They have no spirit or sense of what people choose to call spirit. They do not speak to me.

The disseminators of what passes for news and commentary these days have become anachronisms in my world, a world the United States denies. They are a mix of distorted stories backed by lurid language punt fear through reports of SARS, Hollywood, Palestine, sport, monkeypox, MTV, Korea and other subjects. They are minor myths harnessed to push weird and lurid views. They constitute a theme park for the mind or serve as cocaine for the soul.

Ignoring a large part of what and who we are, they reflect a world that does not exist. They have no relevance to our realisation of our greater selves.

To abuse Dylan, in much the same way as George W. Bush's 'Christianity' has more to do with ersatz religion and 'everything from toy guns that spark to flesh-colored Christs that glow in the dark', it really is easy to see without looking too far that not much is really sacred.

But the average American, glued to the networks and the media that have served government so well for so long, would not know that.

We who oppose the agenda now being pursued by the United States' current administration have time to get our house in order. To do so, we need to take into account our remarkable willingness to sink to the level of those now 'exporting security' to the world. And rise above it. Or we too will become last year's man.

The rain falls down on last year's man, an hour has gone by and he has not moved his hand. But everything will happen if he only gives the word; the lovers will rise up and the mountains touch the ground. But the skylight is like skin for a drum I'll never mend and all the rain falls down amen on the works of last year's man.

Leonard Cohen | Last Year's Man

Y'know, in a town near here, Jefferson, Wisconsin, the Tyson chicken workers are striking for a living wage. I was trying to explain to two privileged young men why we might want to be supportive of this union even though we stride forth in our splendid individualism ready - mano a mano - to compete for a living in this marvelous capitalist culture. They didn't get it. The pendulum has not even reached the perigee of its swing into darkness. The plagues appear on the horizon of our consciousness. The power elite shove the muzzles of their guns down the throats of starving children. Our infrastructure, hard built and lovingly nurtured for over a century is crumbling before our very eyes. And our young men think it's just fine that we should all be reduced to subsistence rather than being sparked by a vision that we should all prosper.

Frank Paynter