"Lousy surf today...I was chatting to Jeneane over the Net. She reckoned I should blog this slightly amended, off-the-cuff response to Esther Dyson's unimaginatively titled article, Cry the beloved country!, a worthwhile read over at ZDNet. It's about growing broadband in South Africa, by the way. You wouldn't think so reading my response to it.
Say what?
Do I do everything Jeneane suggests?
Pretty much. It works for me.Conferences are crap. A buncha people pay plenty money to the organizers, sit around in cocooned hotel conference halls (most of which are jerry-built at First World prices), and waffle about a perfect world. Though I'd not like to prick
Esther's bubble, Goldstuck, the Dubliner and the Eastern Cape tourist [see comments appended to the foot of the article] are more sussed on South Africa than she.
But I'm no techie. Let's get political and draw an analogy. George W. Bush, the MI-Lobby Complex have U.S. government sewn up. Do they have competition? Sure. Ostensibly, they're all for free speech. You have your Michael Moores and Krugmans and Ivinses and Dowds...and of, course, the conspiracy freaks like Chomsky, Fisk, and Pilger writing on the internets.
Not enough competition for you? How about an alternative? The Democrats. There you go then; democracy is alive and well and firmly entrenched in the American psyche.
Anything's arguable, but the truth is generally found elsewhere. I shared broadband with my son ten years ago, using a home network. It made it affordable. When he moved out a few years ago, I went back to dial-up and stayed a hole-in-the-wall blogger until about two months ago. Why? Because the Web's a priority for me and prices
have come down on ADSL (we're still the
most expensive worldwide — a home Internet account is typically
192K (at a base cost of $100, including line rental, ISP fees, and local phone calls) and 1GB boosters on a 3GB cap cost $17 — a fair whack for people earning around $1500 monthly — about 10 percent of one's salary).
But so what?The
Second National Operator? Esther says it; "...another giant,
state-connected entity." Just like the Democrats. Deference might be accorded competition initially, but once the advertising brouhaha's died down, it'll be back to cartels as usual. Telkom's not dumb. They own the lot and when you're in a position to create your competition in your image (and take a 50 percent share in it), you do so.
Like the Democrats.
Business is, after all, politics.
Look, for example, at the cell phone market. Two companies, MTN and Vodacom (Vodafone and
Telkom), financed by ridiculously high rates paid by South African subscribers, built an empire spanning Africa. The result? Eighty million subscribers across the continent. The other half of Africa just made a phone call.
Locally, lobbyists were antsy. Price-fixing and collusion demanded a third operator so, after much vetting, Cell C (a predominantly BEE entity) was
brought into being. Great ads and, for around a year, good prices in the domestic market. Could MTN and Vodacom give a damn? Hell no, they have
Africa in their pockets and Cell C's star is fast a'fading.
I've far better things to do...The Eastern Cape tourist is correct. Cell phones are the future in Africa and Telkom — through Vodacom, owns a big share of it. Perversely, the Internet/Web (broadband or dial-up) — which offers the most promise — is not a priority. Why? Because we just don't get it — in every sense. Just as Esther quotes Goldstuck articulating the short-sighted marketing policies of the stink-rich few, few southern Africans have access to the Web and fewer use it as they could and should.
Again Esther says it: "...there are about a million dial-up accounts and about 280,000 broadband accounts, some of them residential." You probably have more people on the Web in Atlanta, Georgia than we do in the whole of Africa. As for
those that do use it...
Well, okay, I've given my jaundiced opinion of them often enough. Predominantly white, filthy rich and dumb, they wouldn't know a good thing if it hit them between the occipital lobes. They visit chatrooms, watch porn, spout racist shit, or send the occasional email.
Give them their due. We do have a crime problem here. It's not as bad as my Web compatriots make it out to be but, tonight's been drowned out by sirens and flashing lights. It must be Friday. And I live in a predominantly white suburb. Still, although colleagues and their families are being hijacked, knifed, shot, raped and mugged, whites are not affected by crime in as much as those 'not white' are.
Well, I'm not. I walk around with a camera and have yet to be be approached by somebody seeking to relieve me of my worldly or other goods.
By far the majority of South Africans aren't as fortunate. They live in tough areas. Where would they keep computers? Seriously, it's a practical problem.
The average person, who wouldn't have a clue what to do with a PC, wouldn't keep it longer than a day before being shot for it. School laboratories
are being set up by the Shuttleworth Foundation et al, but they're heavily secured and are located in wealthier areas or universities — where the electric fences are.
(Why that's the case, I don't know. These people with electric fences and armed-response signs on their walls are always moaning about being shot or raped.)
...than surf...Either way, a lack of domestic money — the private sector has lots, concentrated in the hands of very few — crime, and other priorities make computing impractical. Wi-fi is not for the poorer areas — cell phone masts are cheaper to replace.
South Africans are gougers. We have many entrepreneurs. They sell to business. They love foreigners too, because they're so fucking gullible. They tell them what they want to hear (these providers will go back to work, continue to beat their staff and treat their short-changed customers like whining ingrates).
They're in it for the house in Camps Bay, the Merc in the drive, the monthly alimony payment, and their erotic-club membership fee. Or something.
Were Telkom to experience any significant competition from the little guys (referred to by the commenter from Dublin), it would regulate them out of business in a day. And can you blame it? I mean, why spoil a good thing like a monopoly?
George W. Bush and the neocons wouldn't. The Democrats, MTN, Vodacom and the singular exceptions making money out of the Net in South Africa won't either. Having no appreciation of the bigger picture, they're determined to play the winners even though it means we all end up losers.
...the internets."Yep, conferences are crap. Like
call centres here and in India, they're big business. As somebody commenting on Esther's article points out, South Africans are good at making a plan. Taking money from tourists and foreign businesspeople who have no idea how vicious we are is one of them.
Screwing their fellow South Africans is another. In fact, it's an art, honed over centuries.
I like smart people. So I like Esther. I like people who question smart people even more. And that's why I put such a premium on an open line to you, Chris, Frank, bmo, WonderChicken, Turner, Shell, Tom et al. Call me cynical, but at least I'm informed by the best...
This was going to be a short note, so I'll leave the pleasantries aside. It's a weird country this, Jeneane, but it's fucking amazing. I don't give a canned damn for exclusivity (I can't afford to) so I get to meet the most remarkable people in the world.
If the bloggers mentioned above were to spend several weeks here, they'd return to the States or Canada with a knowing smirk on their faces; because they'd appreciate the irony of and dig the country.
But Esther's cool. She's working on it and that's a good thing. If I were her, I'd go slow on the advice though. And it's always best to get the low-down from the street rather than the convention centre.
Some of Neotel's clients include Cell C, MTN, Vodacom, Internet Solutions, Telkom, MWeb and Transtel.Mail & Guardian |
Say hello to Neotel, SA's second national operatorNote: I guess I had a bad week, huh? Check out Esther's article. She's really trying to get people off their backsides. I support her in her efforts. But I reckon a social revolution rather than a "kick in the pants" is needed to get the Internet, those selling it, and those abusing it, up to speed in this,
the beloved country.
Alan Paton used a typewriter to commit his legacy to paper, by the way. And were he alive today, he would probably still use the damned thing.