...in Hell's Kitchen
Rome Fiddles While Sudan Burns
Seeing things in black and white...
"I have not heard one U.S. Bishop [pdf] even suggest that Holy Communion might be withheld for any politician who enacted, or voted for, the immoral pre-emptive invasion of Iraq. Yet the consequent loss of human lives - both Iraqi and American - and the devastation of Iraqi society have been nothing short of tragic. Furthermore, this act of spiritual arrogance - invoking God's guidance while invading - has deepened historical animosities that surely will lead to more senseless bloodshed in the Middle East and across the globe." more...
"I wrote about Ms. Khattar in my last two columns, recounting how the Janjaweed Arab militia burned her village, murdered her parents and finally tracked her family down in the mountains. Ms. Khattar hid, but the Janjaweed caught her husband and his brothers, only 4, 6 and 8 years old, and killed them all. ... Ms. Khattar decided that the only hope for saving her two daughters and her baby sister was to lead them by night to Chad. They had to avoid wells where the Janjaweed kept watch, but eight days later, half-dead with hunger and thirst, they staggered across the dry riverbed that marks the border with Chad. ... That's where I found Ms. Khattar. She is part of a wave of 1.2 million people left homeless by the genocide in Darfur." more...
"That stand needs to be "this is genocide and we will not allow it to continue." Nothing short of that will do. We can't solve every problem or stop violence everywhere. But we certainly have an obligation to our fellow human beings when they are being murdered, raped, starved, and displaced by the millions. (And psst... UN, feel free to join in. Maybe boot Sudan off the Human Rights Commission while you're at it.)" more...
A couple of weeks ago, Frank Paynter asked me: "Mike, what the fuck are we going to do about the Sudan?" Frank has a habit of asking the hard questions, but I did what I could to answer him and concluded, "Meanwhile, the aid agencies are doing the piecemeal, humanitarian stuff and, for them, there is little protection. They're the ones with the tough job around the African war zones and, for that, they deserve credit and support."
Today, as the pols consider Sudan's potential as a vote grabber, Nicholas D. Kristof writes of 35-year old Hatum Atraman Bashir who carries the baby of one of 20 Janjaweed (Jingaweit) raiders who murdered her husband and then gang-raped her. Before Sudan becomes a media circus, replete with bloggers slanging each other and nobody at all for soon-to-be-committed atrocities in the streets of Khartoum, my advice remains the same. Give something... anything... to the aid agencies.
Kristof offers a great set of links to humanitarian organizations doing what they can to save lives in Darfur and eastern Chad. Follow them rather than lose yourself in the web spun by one of the oldest political organizations in the world. You'll save more lives doing so.
We have enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745
Note Using the blogs to good effect, the conservative Sudan: The Passion of the Present, "...a labor of love by a small group of people" offers background and breaking news on the Sudanese genocide and provides links to a host of aid agencies and organizations.
"The norm of the church is clear. The church exists in the United States. There are bishops there, let them interpret it." Cardinal Francis Arinze
Although circumstance has much to do with it, I happen to be a practising Catholic; with a capital 'C'. Choice does enter the equation, as does conviction and, to a degree, faith. Whatever... it does not matter.
I'm a product of a two-thousand year old culture. There's no escaping it. My appreciation of my culture, which coincides with that of the Catholic Church, grows as its relevance diminishes in a fast-globalising world where culture and tradition are seen as trash in need of recycling for use by the mighty dollar. And that's why the mind-numbingly short-sighted decision of political priests who've lost sight of the basis of their religion really pisses me off. What gives these selective bigots the right to deny others' communion?
Nothing. By doing so, they betray everything Catholicism stands for.
The decision to deny communion to politicians being pro-choice or supporting abortion stems from a Church Instruction "...on certain matters to be observed or to be avoided regarding the Most Holy Eucharist", Redemptionis Sacramentum. This document derives from a select group of people striving to uphold an ideal—a Sacred ideal, i.e. ensuring the Eucharist is treated with due reverence. As far as I can make out, the ideal was lost when a reporter asked Cardinal Arinze, prefect of the Congregation of Divine Worship and the Sacraments, whether the practical application of Redemptionis Sacramentum should preclude pro-choice politicians receiving Communion.
Well, much like Pilate, he washed his hands of the matter. "The norm of the church is clear," he said. "The church exists in the United States. There are bishops there, let them interpret it." And that was that.
Two thousand years of spiritual insight went up in the smoke of an official's ill-considered oiliness and John F. Kerry, a politician who looks as though he died ten years ago, was summarily struck from St. Peter's roll and a mass-media photo-opportunity. Given the nature of the Eucharist and a basic grasp of transubstantiation, I cannot see how any man can deny Christ to another. In other words, it is not up to the Church hierarchy to decide who may or who may not receive Communion. To assume it is in his power to do so, is to give man's interpretation of the Will of God greater clout than God's Will; whatever that may be.
Such an assumption is supremely arrogant and yet another indication of just how far Catholic officialdom has divorced itself from or, incorrectly, sees itself as, the pilgrim Church on Earth. As far as I know, Catholic means "universal". In a broad—and spiritual—sense, we Catholics believe we have a hold on Truth. For Truth, read God. This is not weird. Every major religion claims ownership of the Truth. Where Catholics differ from other religions, as I see it (and the nature of the Sacraments aside), is that we do not hold Truth to be exclusive to (or for) us.
Why? Because we cannot begin to comprehend it. And that which we cannot comprehend, we cannot own. The Truth is or should be made available to everybody, no matter who or what they are. And that means everybody; Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindi, Buddhist, etc. If God is Truth and He offers Himself to man through Communion, who then are these bishops to deny Communion to those at odds with dogma or Divine Revelation as understood by homo sapiens leaping about an increasingly hostile rock circling the Sun?
No-one. The nut of it is that my, or anybody else's, readiness to receive Communion is between God and me. The person dispensing Communion has nothing to do with it.
As people lining up to receive Communion, we observe certain rites and rituals. These 'scene setters' induce an air or feeling of reverence. Hitting the right state of Grace without undue assistance from the pharmaceutical industry, we are well-placed to receive that which comes with the Eucharist. Who decides my readiness? A bishop? A priest? Hell, no. God does. In preparation, we go to Confession, another Sacrament. This enables me to believe I have made an honest effort to reach the state of Grace necessary to receive Communion. Who decides my penance? The bishop? The priest? Hell, no. God does.
The bishop and the priest do not, or should not, enter the confessional. If they believe they do, I'd rather not open up to a Church official quite capable of rogering his altar boys.
In short, when it comes to "...certain matters to be observed or to be avoided regarding the Most Holy Eucharist", the bishop or the priest's job is to get his own house in order. Should he be messing about with the choir ladies, the Eucharist is not properly blessed and the whole exercise becomes a travesty. While I entrust the priest or the bishop to guide me—despite my dissatisfaction with his conduct in denying females entry to the clergy, his white-washing of sexual abuse, and his refusal to speak out on social matters, he has no jurisdiction over my soul.
That's between God and me, who denies Himself to nobody.
Should Bill Clinton have received Communion? Of course. Should John Kerry receive Communion? Of course. It is through receiving Communion that he and I might see how wrong (according to Church officials) we are in being pro-choice, accepting of gays, susceptible to sins of the flesh, etc. Should George W. Bush receive Communion? Hell yes. Bring him on. Every bit helps.
Bishop Wilton D. Gregory, President of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, is as slippery a customer as Cardinal Arinze. Ducking questions as to what he'd do should Kerry pitch for Communion, he welcomes the Cardinal's statement and announces the establishment of a "a task force to discuss issues with regard to the participation of Catholics in political life".
How about a task force investigating the participation of politicians in Catholic life? Now, forgive me, I must cut this short. I'm off to Mass... And Communion.